Saturday, November 7, 2009

09-11-07 Case Presentation #3 – Parks v Zernik (BC369558)

Modified Nov 8, 2009

Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Central District

Notice:

1) This record is incomplete.

2) Individuals, corporations, and government agencies named in this record in what a lay-person would term "widespread corruption" were provided initial notice on November 7, 2009. This record may be further modified with no further notice. However, the latest version is posted on blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/

Executive Summary

Parks v Zernik (BC369558) was a short-lived litigation related to Samaan v Zernik. Complaint was filed in April 2007 on cause of action of Defamation (Slender/Libel). It stemmed from statements, which were repeated on numerous occasions by Joseph Zernik - Victor Parks, was directly involved in financial fraud - as Loan Broker at Pacific Mortgage Consultants, whose name appeared on the Loan Applications of Nivie Samaan, which were submitted to Countrywide Financial Corporation in 2004. The complaint was dismissed by Victor Parks for unknown reasons in August 2007. Later, the loan applications by Samaan, fraudulently signed in the name of Victor Parks, were indeed opined as fraud by fraud expert.

To this date, the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, denies Defendant Joseph Zernik access to court records in this case.

A. Case Description

Real estate fraud was opined by nationally acclaimed fraud experts in what is disguised as litigation at the Superior Court of California – Samaan v Zernik (SC087400). Even prior to experts opinions in this matter, Defendant Zernik expressed such opinions, emphasizing the central role of Victor Parks in the initial conduct of the fraud in 2004 – he allowed Jae Arre Lloyd, a convicted felon, and Samaan’s husband, to operate a branch loan brokerage, under Victor Parks’ name in Los Angeles, while Victor Parks resided outside Los Angeles County.

It was under the name of Victor Parks that Samaan’s prequalificaion letter – also separately opined as fraud - was produced. It was also under the name of Victor Parks that Samaan’s loan applications (1003) – also separately opined as fraud - were filed with Countrywide.


B. Denial of Access To Court Records

Denial of public access to court records is alleged as one of the hallmarks of the Racket. There simply is no plausible reasonable explanation for reverting to medieval standards in the courts.


1. Paper Court File

No attempts were made to access the paper court file.


2. Register of Actions

Access to the Register of Actions is denied, regardless of repeated requests.


C. Special Issues & Alleged Criminalities

It is alleged that even absent access to the Register of Actions, and with hardly any records or actions in the case, one can detect in it the unmistakable signs of a case that was targeted for the Equity/Enterprise Track.[i]


D. Judges, Referees

1. Andria K. Richey, Presiding


E. Parties and Counsel

Copied from the online Case Summary[ii]

1. Bakshandeh Joseph Esq - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

2. Does 1 Through 20 - Defendant/Respondent

3. Parks Victor - Plaintiff/Petitioner

4. Zernik Joseph - Defendant & Defendant in Pro Per

F. Related Cases

1. Samaan v Zernik (SC087400)

Posted by at
Labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)