Sunday, November 15, 2009

09-11-15 Important Addendum to the Index regarding RICHARD FINE.


_ - - - - - -- - _ - - - - - -- - _ - - - - - -- - _ - - - - - -- -
Judge Yaffe, Sheriff Baca, and the old Flimflam:
Regarding the arrest and jailing of Atty Richard Fine, who in under solitary confinement for some 7 months... I am told he never gets to see the sky for months at a time,

Part I
I wrote the following in the Index posting:

Atty Richard Fine's sentencing proceeding, in Marina v LA County, was a different story altogether. It was widely reported by media, who were present in the courtroom, at Mosk- downtown LA... It purportedly took place on March 4, 2009... and Atty Fine was arrested by 11:05am... These reporters were of course all deluded... Just because media were there, witnessing Judge David Yaffe saying that he was sentencing Richard Fine to "continuous confinement", and just because Richard Fine was immediately after that arrested by the Warrant Detail, of the Sheriff Department of the County of Los Angeles, didn't mean a thing... It was an alleged "off the record" Calendar Fraud combined with little Warrant Fraud - the old flimflam... These reporters should have reviewed the list below, before reporting what they thought they witnessed to the public at large... It is obvious that the reporters were all deluded... because the computer system of the Sheriff Department shows that it indeed took place on March 4, 2009, at 11:05, ok, but not in Mosk downtown, but instead, in the Never-Existed-Municipal Dept 86, in San Pedro... As far as I am concerned - I would trust the computer systems of the Courts and the Sheriff before I trust any deluded reporter...

The last thing we need today, with the threat of terror attacks, is anybody doubting of the justice system of Los Angeles County, California... thinking that I was trying to infer that there possibly was a Warrantless Arrest, or any appearance of an illusion of a slim chance of a Fourth Amendment violation, or even False Imprisonment in the case of Richard Fine.
Doubting Thomas
Let me assure all the Doubting Thomases out there... I an not an attorney, not even by a long shot... Richard Fine was arrested after review by State of California Judge David Yaffe. That should be good enough. In addition - his Habeas Corpus Petition was taken care of in the U.S Court, LA, and on top of it, his Petition was handled by the U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th District. Triple procedure, that should be good enough even for a nitpicker!

A Nitpicker

a) U.S. Magistrate Carla Woehrle - of the U.S. District Court, Los Angeles posted a 25 page Report and Recommendations on the Habeas corpus Petition with footnotes, citations and all. Obviously it was no rush job (Report and Recommendations). True, it was never authenticated, and it therefore not a valid court paper. But let's leave that aside. In the 25 pages Report, she never even mentioned the (1) Name of the case she was reviewing for over two months- Marina Strand Colony Home Owner's Association v County of Los Angeles. Well, maybe she wasn't really sure if it were a valid case of the Superior Court... Frankly, I don't think it's a big deal, Joe, Joey, or Joseph, it's all the same to me... There are a number of cases identified in the past couple of years that are not cases of the court. For lack of better term, I call them "Equity/Enterprise Track". The general operation is referred to as the LA-JR (the alleged LA Judiciary Racket) Most - are real estate cases - which this one in essence was as well. The evidence is overwhelming - only FBI and U.S. Dept of Justice cannot see it. Myopia.

Joey Tribbiani

Some people are fussy, they say that there was no (2) Warrant for the arrest. Personally - I don't know what it's supposed to look like. I probably wouldn't know a Warrant from a Writ or a Warranty even if you dropped it on my keyboard. However, I ran a word search on "Warrant" - and I can tell you for sure it was never mentioned in the report either. [1]

A Nitpicker

Then come the nitpickers. They say that there was no effectual record for (3) Sentencing and Judgment for the jailing either. Careful review shows that Magistrate Woehrle was fully aware of the small inconveniece, but she streamlined it rather effectively.[2] And the nattering nabobs expected also a (4) Register of Actions (California docket), as if there was not enough paperwork already.

Nattering Nabob
They say that reviewing a case without a court file is like writing a book review without reading the book. However, doing it with no Register of Actions, is like not bothering to read the Cliff's Notes either...

I say: U.S. Magistrate Carla Woehrle did a fine job, and wrote an impressive report, which recommended - "deny with prejudice". Those who object are just placing form above substance.

b) U.S. Judge John Walter, of the U.S. District Court, took his time for additional review after receiving the Report and Recomendation, and he finally accepted the Report in the Judgment posted on July 29, 2009. (Judgment) The Judgment was never authenticated either, but that's again just technicalities...

c) Richard Fine also filed a Petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit. The Petition was throughly reviewed by a panel of three Judges of the Court, which is second in authority only to the U.S. Supreme Court! Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, and Circuit Judges Richard Paez and Richard Tallman. They denied the Petition on June 30, 2009:
"petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrant the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v United States Dist Court 557 F 2d 650 (9th Circ 1977). The petition is denied."(Order)
Even my Mom never called me a "brilliant jurist"... But with all due respect, it looks to me like someone copied the Bauman out of habit, into the denial of the wrong petition... This was coming from Habeas Corpus... I know I am clueless, but I thought that Habeas Corpus was for clueless guys... For prisoners, way back when... Or even today - like Richard Fine- who are denied pen and paper. I thought that in Habeas Corpus, the prisoner does not have to say much at all. Just to ask to be brought before a judge for review. In turn, the judge is not asked to do much either, only to inquire, that the confinement conformed with the fundamentals of the law. If not - to immediately release the prisoner.

A Nitpicker
What are the fundamental? It the nitpickers again!

The Chief Judge, in particular, is well-known as a brilliant jurist, and a champion of Civil Rights. The U.S. Constitution and the Amendment are what the U.S. Courts are all about. These guys split hairs about the validity of an arrest, which started under exigency, with no Warrant, while the Warrant was being written, whereas the exigency turned into non-exigency, just before the Warrant was completed. Here we have no (1) Warrant, and no (2) Judgment, and (3) No Register of Actions for a guy in solitary confinement for 7 months. I leave to them to explain their unsigned denial order.

Part II
I was curious... Also this Register of Actions sounded like something exciting... I wonder why there is no video game yet - karate, or kung fu sound best under that title...

A Register of Actions
I knew that court papers were Public Records, in fact, someone told me that the Habeas Corpus and the Right to Access Court Records were connected at the hips...I am sure he was joking... So far I have seen no Register of Actions, no Warrant, no hips, no thighs and no chicken wings, nada... And I have been on this job for at least a couple of months.
Hips by Beyonce
To make sure, I asked, a Civil Rights organization, and they told me that it was a slam dunk, you just say First Amendment, and you get the Register of Actions and Warrant from the court immediately. On top of that, they told me, in California we are ahead of pack, because even the Arrest and Booking papers are public records according to the California Public Records Act... They said that they routinely get the papers in other counties. They even gave me the code section and the subsection to put in the letters.

Regardless, I never got to see the Register of Actions... in fact, Richard Fine never got to see it either. That's how we run the business in Los Angeles, for years, both civil and criminal litigations - with secret court records. What I got was a series of long letters from a guy who said that he was "Counsel" for the court... I never knew that the court needed a lawyer...When a guy makes a trial request. But then again, I know why they would not let anybody see it. Because in cases where I did get to see the Register of Actions, it provided full documentation for the operation of an enterprise through a conduct in a pattern of racketeering activity.

With the Sheriff, it was more elaborate. I asked for the Warrant and Arrest and Booking. I faxed the requests, and receipt was confirmed, and for some three weeks, I was on the phone almost daily with Sergeant Burson, and Commander Liang. First, they sent me to the Jail'a Front Office, downtown LA. My request was denied for considerations related to the safety of the inmates. I was sent to Cindy, in the Discovery Unit, in City of Commerce. Cindy was confused, she could not figure out why they sent me to her. Then I was directed to Municipal Division 86 in San Pedro. They said that Richard Fine was arrested and booked in San Pedro, that is the official information online Inmate Information Center. The problem was- there was no such thing as Municipal Division 86 in San Pedro, and no Booking facilities there either. Then Sergeant Burson told me that the Legal Department of the Sheriff's office may allow me to see the paper, which he called "Removal Order", and I call Remand Order. [1] I also pointed out to Sheriff Lee Baca's office that the arrest was reported by media, and the data in the Sheriff system was obviously false. After that - they would not answer any more questions regarding the papers. The last I heard from Commander Liang was" The Sheriff's Department practices full transparency". And the papers? "If you want to see the paper you would have to get a court order for that".
I say it's a flimflam. All they got, and all that was ever produced in the past was that order which was no Warrant for sure.
I am surprised nobody makes fuss about the Order from the 9th Court of Appeals, the copy that was posted online in the docket looks unsigned. I was on the service list, and I got served with the Order. Mine was unsigned as well. It came with no authentication by the clerk either, just like all the papers from the U.S. District Court [3]. The LA Superior Court never entered an effectual judgment and never issued an effectual Warrant... and the Sheriff Deparatment never performed effectual Booking and is keeping Richard Fine under false registration "off the record".
Bottom Line - All four agencies of the justice system worked in perfect harmony, streamlined in deceiving and depriving Richard Fine of Liberty.

The Old Flimflam
Epilogue:
So where does it leave us? Nitpickers and nattering nabobs would ask for a Warrant, a Judgment and a Register of Actions, as "fundamentals". But since we are dealing with flimflams, I would say - if you show me any one of the three: (1)Warrant, (2) Judgment, or (3) Register of Actions, valid and effectual - that would be nice. Flimflam with 1:3 is OK, but flimflam with 0:3 is Fraud.
Alternatively - Why not just move Richard Fine to Guantanamo Bay, and "pronounce" him a Detainee?

Joe Zernik
Los Angeles County, California
We own the "C" in Corruption

[1] Regarding the missing Warrant
The word "Warrant" never appears in the Report and Recommendation. On the other hand, the word "Warrant" does appear in the code sections that Magistrate Woehrle cited as the basis for the jailing:
Cal Code Civ Proc §§ 1211-1219.

§1113 ...judge must direct, by an endorsement on the warrant...
§1219a)(a) Except as provided in subdivisions (b) and (c), when thecontempt consists of the omission to perform an act which is yet in the power of the person to perform, he or she may be imprisoned until he or she has performed it, and in that case the act shall be specified in the warrant of commitment.
However, in the case of Richard Fine, there is no (a) warrant, there is no (b) endorsement,by a judge there is (c) no specification in the non-warrant of the act to be performed, and there is (d) no reference to any other record which provides the authority for the confinement, or specifies the act to be performed. Instead, the Deputy Clerk issued a Remand Order. That too, much later in the afternoon, it was faxed at 4:31pm, while the arrest was at 11:05am, and the false booking was purported to have taken place at 12:23pm at San Pedro. No exigency either...

[2] Regarding the delusional proceeding on March 4, 2009:Careful review of the Report and recommendation reveals that Magistrate Woehrle was likely aware of the schizophrenic nature of that proceeding. In listing the ancillary proceedings that were part of the unnamed litigation under review she stated:
"Trial was held before Judge Yaffe on December 22, 24, 26, and 30, 2008, and January 8, 12, and 22, 2009." (p8)
No March 4, 2009 proceeding!
Later, when she needed to find basis for the sentencing, she stated:
"Judge Yaffe pronounced sentence on March 4, 2009." (p9)
Therefore, the sentencing was oral sentencing only, and the evidence that she brings for it was the Transcript...

[3] There were also some little issues with the paper record of the Habeas Corpus Petition, which the Supervisor of the Intake Unit said she agreed with me should be looked at. For a couple of months I tried to do it by correspondence with the Terry Nafisi, the Clerk of the U.S. District Court, but it got nowhere. So on Sept 18, 2009, I went in person, and hand delivered the letter to the clerk, asking to see the habeas corpus paper record. The Deputy Clerk on duty gave me no on the this one. He claimed that the petition was shredded. I later asked to see the records of the shredding. Never got an answer. I also asked to see the authentication of the records (NEFs) of the habeas corpus case. I got a no on this one as well, with no explanation at all.

Nothing in all of this is new. I call it the "Fingerprints of the LA-JR". We see it routinely in the cases we collect. Fraud on the entry of judgment is standard. Fraud in coercing an un-appointed referee is also common. False imprisonment - beyond real estate fraud - that the specialty. We have thousands of Rampart-FIPs who were never release in the past decade.
Welcome to the LA-JR - this is the conduct of the enterprise in the pattern of racketeering activity.
More on the LA-JR - on the blog http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/

09-11-15 Indexing - getting organized!

Better Safe than Sorry!
Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR
Los Angeles Superior Court
Best remebered for derailing the
First Rampart Trial (2000)

If you have business in any of the Los Angeles courts, you better go down the list below. Make sure that you are readily familiar with all types of courtroom frauds listed below... Better safe than sorry...

If you need help, just email jz12345@earthlink.net... I am not an attorney, not even by a long shot, so I never learned about any of them in any college... However, I have some testimonials, to show that I do know a thing or two about courtroom frauds... I learned it in the school of hard knocks...

Index for Blog In Pro Per In LA
It ended up being a bit more complex than I thought, putting together this index, but what you see below, is at least a first approximation. I realize now that I have to write also a short overview with timeline for each of the cases that I refer to in the Blog, and which are listed in the Index, below.

Be Prepared!
If you have business with the Los Angeles Courts, especially if any of the judges, parties, or counsel marked in red are involved, you better do you homework. Whether you are an attorney or a lay-person like me... You better go down the list, and make sure that you are readily familiar with the various types of fraud listed in the index... I got acquainted with them all on location - in the Los Angeles Courts... It is not a question of maybe, in Los Angeles - it's reflexive...

For example: In Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) I filed in pro se a complaint at the U.S. District Court, Los Angeles against some 10 judges of the LA Superior Court, Countrywide, and some others. I claimed that the judges named in the complaint, led by Jacqueline Connor (best remembered for derailing the First Rampart Trial in 2000), while engaging in alleged Assignment Frauds, Index Fraud, Judgment Fraud, and many other alleged frauds.. engaged in fact in what amounted to racketeering, to cater to Countrywide, Sandor Samuels - then Chief Legal Officer (today - Associate General Counsel of Bank of America Corporation - streamlining as usual...), and Angelo Mozilo (no need for introduction for him...). There is no doubt that I was clueless. However, for half a year I was looking for counsel to help me. Nobody would - not even incognito - it's too dangerous - they told me... Since any attorney in LA knew that if his/her name would have been associated with any complaint regarding corruption, they would end up sampling the same menus as Steve Yagman and Richard Fine...

In his sentencing proceeding, Steve Yagman was reported to say that the case was "A cage went looking for a bird...".

Atty Richard Fine's sentencing proceeding, in Marina v LA County, was a different story altogether. It was widely reported by media, who were present in the courtroom, in Mosk- downtown LA... It purportedly took place on March 4, 2009... and Atty Fine was arrested by 11:05am... These reporters were of course all deluded... Just because media were there, witnessing Judge David Yaffe saying that he was sentencing Richard Fine to "continuous confinement", and just because Richard Fine was immediately after that arrested by the Warrant Detail, didn't mean a thing... It was an alleged "off the record" Calendar Fraud combined with little Warrant Fraud - the old flimflam... These reporters should have reviewed the list below, before reporting what they thought they witnessed to the public at large... It is obvious that the reporters were all deluded... because the computer system of the Sheriff Department shows that it indeed took place on March 4, 2009, at 11:05, ok, but not in Mosk downtown, but instead, in the Never-Existed-Municipal Dept 86, in San Pedro... As far as I am concerned - I would trust the computer systems of the Courts and the Sheriff before I trust any deluded reporter...

Back to the Zernik v Connor. Pitted against a clueless guy were -
  1. Bryan Cave, LLP - One of the largest law-firm in the world, appearing in alleged Counsel of Record Fraud...
  2. Buchalter Nemer - One of the larger law-firms in the U.S. - which had engaged in a previous episode at the LA Superior Court in the alleged Incognito Counsel Fraud...
  3. Pasternak, Pasternak, Patton - With David Pasternak appearing simultaneously In Pro Se, and represented by Counsel alleged Fraud- which I forgot to list in the Index... In previous episodes, he engaged in a wide variety of alleged frauds. His Grant Deed Fraud was confirmed by a top notch fraud expert.
  4. Cummings McClorey Davis Acho - Specializing in representing the judges...
  5. Sheppard Mullin, LLP - In assist, off the U.S. Court - after a long track of alleged Frauds in perfect coordination with Judge Jacqueline Connor, at the LA Superior Court. No surprise there - it was the law-firm where the Presiding Judge of the LA Superior Court was formerly a partner...
You would think that with such fire-power, a clueless guy would be devastated in 30 days or less... and the brlliant attorneys would show the skills and smarts.... Well, no exactly... It took from March 2008 till April 2009... And even so, these law-firms just could not accomplish it, one must conclude - without a little bit of help from some friends... A whole variety - from the moment I filed the complaint at the U.S. Court - with alleged Summons Fraud, combined with an alleged Case Number Designation Fraud, and all the way to the day that the purported Judgment of dismissal was issued.

You better be prepared!!!

I am also available for speaking engagements, and would be happy to present a selection from a wide variety of alleged frauds practiced in the courts today. Fresh material...

Joe Zernik
Dr Z (not for profit pending)
Joseph H Zernik, DMD, PhD PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750; Fax: 801.998.0917; E-Mail: jz12345@earthlink.net

U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent
A corrupt judge.
_____________________________________________
IN PRO PER IN LA
BLOG INDEX
NOTICE: MANY CATEGORIES WERE SPLIT – WITH A SECTION MARKED ALL-CRIM – ALLEGED CRIMINALITY

SUBJECT

HEADING

TERM

1. Attorneys-Legal Profession

1.1Attorneys-Law-Firms

1.1.1FINE, RICHARD

1.1.2JUSTICE PIONEER

1.1.3MAYOPOULOS, TIMOTHY

1.2Attorneys-Law-Firms

1.2.1 BRYAN CAVE - All Crim

1.2.1.1 - AMBERG, JOHN All Crim

1.2.1.2 - MOLDAWSKY, JENNA – All Crim

1.2.1.3 - MODISETT, JEFF – All Crim

1.2.2 BENTON, ORR, DUVAL, BUCKINGHAM

1.2.2.1 - MCCORMICK, KEVIN – All Crim

1.2.3 GENERAL COUNSEL, BAC

1.2.3.1 - O’KEEFE, ED – All Crim All Crim

1.2.4 PASTERNAK, PASTERNAK, PATTON All Crim

1.2.4.1 - PASTERNAK, DAVID – All Crim

1.2.4.2 – KALAYDJIAN LISA – All Crim

1.2.5 ROSEN, JOSHUA - All Crim All-Crim

1.2.6 SHEPPARD MULLIN, LLP – All Crim

1.2.6.1 - KESHAVARZI, MOHAMMAD – All Crim

1.2.7 UKONLORIZ – All Crim

1.2.7.1 - LORITZ, DANIEL – All Crim

1.2.8 BUCHALTER NERMER – All Crim

1.2.8.1 – ORMOND, RICHARD – All Crim

1.3 Law Schools and Faculty

1.3.1CHEMERINSKY, ERVIN

1.3.2GRUNDFEST, JOSEPH

1.3.3BURCHAM, DAVID

1.3.4FINK, ELISABETH

1.3.5 WARREN, ELIZABETH

2. Cases U.S.

2.1 Crt-Sup

2.1.1 FAY V NOIA (1963)

2.1.2 NIXON V WARNER COMM INC (1978)

2.2 Crt-App-9th

2.2.1 FINE V SHERIFF (09-71692) All-Crim

2.2.2 FINE V U.S. DISTRICT COURT, LA (09-56073)

2.2.3 HADDICK V US DIST CT LA (97-50090)

2.2.4 ZERNIK V US DIST CT, LA (08-72714) All-Crim

2.3 Crt-Dist-CA-Cent

2.3.1 FINE V SHERIFF (2:09-CV-01914) All-Crim

2.3.2 SCHAFFER V HARTFORD LIFE (5:08-CV-01184) All-Crim

2.3.3 USA V HADDICK (95-CR-01161) All Crim

2.3.4 USA V CITY OF LA ET AL (2:2000-CV-11769)

2.3.5 ZERNIK V CONNOR ET AL (2:08-CV-01550) All-Crim

2.4 Crt-Dist-DC

2.4.1 ZERNIK V MELSON AT AL. (1:09-CV-00805) All-Crim

2.5 Crt-Dist-NY-Sthn

2.5.1 SEC V BAC (1:09-CV-06829) Likely Crim

2.6 Crt-Bkt-PA-Westn

2.6.1 BRWR SHARON D HILL, (01-22574) All Crim

2.7 Crt-Bkt-TX-Cent

2.7.1 BRWR W-M A PARSLEY, (4-05-BK-90374) All Crim

3. Cases CA Sup Crt

3.1 Ca Sup Crt

3.2 Ca Crt App – All-Crim

3.2.1 FILIPESCU V. CA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY (APP. 2 DIST.1995)All-Crim

3.2.2 IN RE: FINE ON HABEAS CORPUS (B214321) All-Crim

3.2.3 GALDJIE V DARWISH ET AL (B191327, B179667, B163970) All-Crim

3.2.4 SAMAAN V ZERNIK (B203063) All-Crim

3.2.5 STURGEON V LA COUNTY 2008 (D050832) All-Crim

3.2.6 ZERNIK V LA SUP CRT1/2 (B199661, B204029, B204164, B205195) All-Crim

3.2.7 ZERNIK V LA SUP CRT 2/2 (B205686, B205737, B206838) All-Crim

3.3 La Sup Crt – All-Crim

3.3.1 DERWISH V DARWISH (SC060217) All-Crim

3.3.2 GALDJIE V DARWISH (SC052737). All-Crim

3.3.3 HANKS V WOODS (SC083585) All-Crim

3.3.4 MARINA V COUNTY (BS109420) All-Crim

3.3.5 PARKS V ZERNIK (BC369558) All-Crim

3.3.6 SAMAAN V ZERNIK (SC087400) All-Crim

3.3.7 STURGEON V LA COUNTY (BC351286) All-Crim

3.3.8 PARKS v ZERNIK (BC369558) All-Crim

TBN -STOP CRIMES, USC, CHERI, NICK

4. CMS

4.1 Edge - Countrywide/BAC –All-Crim

4.1.1 NON-COMPLIANCE

4.1.2SECURITY

4.1.3TIME FRAMES

4.1.4UNDERWRITING LETTERS

4.1.5UNDERWRITING-AUTHORITIES

4.2 Sustain - La Superior Court-All-Crim

4.2.1REGISTER OF ACTIONS

4.2.2MINUTE ORDERS

4.2.3OPERATION

4.2.4INSTALLATION

4.2.5NON-COMPLIANCE

4.2.6DICTIONARY

4.3 Criminal - La Superior Court-All-Crim

4.4 Inmate Info- Sheriff, La County-All-Crim

4.5 TBN - California Court Of Appeal

4.6 Pacer - US Dist Crt- All-Crim

4.7 Cm/ECF - US Dst Crt-All-Crim

4.8 Pacer - US Crt App-All-Crim

4.9 CM/ECF - US Crt App-All-Crim

4.10

5 Computer

5.1 Financial Inst

GOV-BACKED-LENDERS

OTHER

5.2 Government

COURTS

CORRECTION-INST

OTHER

5.3 Other

5.4 Public Corporations

5.5 Security

5.6 Validity-Logic-Verification

5.7

6 Concepts-Terms

6.1 General

6.1.1COMMUNICATIONS-LETTER-FAX-EMAIL

6.1.2POLICY/ECONOMIC

6.1.3POLICY/ECONOMIC/BANKING-REGULATION

6.1.4POLICY/ECONOMIC/WEALTH-DISTR-POVERTY

6.1.5POLICY/INTERNATIONAL

6.1.6POLICY/JUSTICE

6.1.7POLICY/URBAN-DEVELOPMENT

6.1.8URBAN-HISTORY

6.2 Legal

6.2.1EQUAL PROTECTION

6.2.2CONVEYANCE OF TITLE

6.2.3 GRANT-DEED

6.2.4 COMMUNICATIONS-LETTER-FAX-EMAIL

6.2.5 NOTICE

6.2.6 FUNDS

6.2.7 ACCESS TO COUNSEL

6.2.8 PAYMENT

6.2.9 ACCESS TO COURTS

6.2.10 ACCESS TO RECORDS

6.2.11 ACCESS TO RECORDS FRAUD

6.2.12 COMPLAINT

6.2.13 DISQUALIFICATION

6.2.14 DISQUALIFICATION FRAUD

6.2.15 DRUG-POLICY

6.2.16 JUDGMENT

6.2.17 JURISDICTION

6.2.18 ORDER

6.2.19 ORDER/MINUTE-ORDER

6.2.20 PETITION

6.2.21 PUBLIC RECORD

6.2.22 RECUSAL

6.2.23 SIGNATURE

6.2.24 WHISTLE BLOWING

6.2.25 BOOKS OF COURT

6.2.26 BOOK OF JUDGMENTS

6.2.27 BOOK OF JUDGMENTS FRAUD

6.2.28 REGISTER OF ACTIONS

6.2.29 INVALID REGISTRY FRAUD

6.2.30 CALENDAR OF THE COURTS

6.2.31 CALENDAR FRAUD

6.2.32 SUMMONS

6.2.33 SUMMONS FRAUD

6.2.34 WARRANT

6.2.35 WARRANT FRAUD

6.2.36 BACK-DATING ORDERS FRAUD

6.2.37 PIGGY-BACK CALENDARING FRAUD

6.2.38 SECRET DISPOSAL OF ORDERS FRAUD

6.2.39 INDEX OF ALL CASES

6.2.40 CASE SUMMARY

6.2.41 LA-JR (alleged LA-Judiciary Racket)

6.2.42 EQUITY/ENTERPRISE TRACK

6.2.43 INDEX OF ALL CASES FRAUD

6.2.44 DEMURRER FRAUD

6.2.45 JUDGMENT FRAUD

6.2.46 STATUTE OF FRAUDS FRAUD

6.2.47 REFEREE FRAUD

6.2.48 DEBTOR EXAMINER FRAUD

6.2.49 RECEIVER FRAUD

6.2.50 RECEIVER

6.2.51 DEBTOR EXAMINER

6.2.52 REFEREE

6.2.53 ASSIGNMENT ORDER

6.2.54 APPOINTMENT ORDER

6.2.55 APPOINTMENT ORDER FRAUD

6.2.56 ASSIGNMENT ORDER FRAUD

6.2.57 SERVICE & NOTICE

6.2.58 WAIVER OF SERVICE & NOTICE FRAUD

6.2.59 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

6.2.60 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT FRAUD

6.2.61 FALSE ON ITS FACE COURT RECORD

6.2.62 AUTHENTICATION (legal)

6.2.63 CERTIFICATION (legal)

6.2.64 GRANT DEED

6.2.65 GRANT DEED FRAUD

6.2.66 VERIFICATION (legal)

6.2.67 VERIFICATION FRAUD

6.2.68 VERIFICATION (computer science)

6.2.69 VALIDATION (social sciences,- instrument construction)

6.2.70 AUTHENTICATION FRAUD

6.2.71 ATTESTATION

6.2.72 ENDORSEMENT

6.2.73 EXECUTION (of record)

6.2.74 EXECUTION (of Judgment)

6.2.75 EXECUTION (of Judgment) FRAUD

6.2.76 ENTERED ORAL JUDGMENT FRAUD

6.2.77 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (by notary)

6.2.78 NOTARY PUBLIC

6.2.79 NOTARY FRAUD

6.2.80 COUNSEL OF RECORD

6.2.81 INCOGNITO COUNSEL FRAUD

6.2.82 COUNSEL OF RECORD FRAUD

6.2.83 RECREATED LETTERS FRAUD

6.2.84 LITIGATION FEES

6.2.85 JOURNAL ENTRY FRAUD

6.2.86 PARTY

6.2.87 NON-PARTY FRAUD

6.2.88 NEF

6.2.89 NEF FRAUD

7. Criminality

7.1 Corruption

7.1.1 CORRUPTION-JUDICIAL

7.1.2. CORRUPTION-WIDESPREAD

7.2 Fraud

7.2.0FRAUD

7.2.1FRAUD-CONVEYANCE OF TITLE

7.2.2FRAUD-FINANCIAL-INST

7.2.3FRAUD-INDUCEMENT

7.2.4FRAUD-MORTGAGE

7.2.5FRAUD-REAL-ESTATE

7.2.6FRAUD-WIRE-FAX

7.2.7FRAUD-WIRE-INTERNET

7.2.8FRAUD-WIRE-PHONE

7.2.9

7.3 Human Rights-Abuse

7.3.1ABUSE OF HUMAN RIGHTS

7.3.2ABUSE OF HUMAN RIGHTS-UNDER-COLOR-OF-LAW

7.4 Justice-Adulteration

7.4.1FALSE CLAIMS

7.4.2FALSIFICATION OF COURT RECORDS

7.4.3FALSIFICATION OF COURT RECORDS/BACK-DATING

7.4.4JUSTICE-CORRUPTION

7.4.5JUSTICE-OBSTRUCTION

7.4.6JUSTICE-PERVERSION

7.4.7PRETENSE-OF-AUTHORITY

7.4.8PRETENSE-OF-JURISDICTION

7.4.9PRETENSE-OF-LITIGATION

7.5 False Confinement

7.5.1FALSE ARREST

7.5.2FALSE BOOKING

7.5.3FALSE JAILING

7.5.4FALSE IMPRISONMENT

7.5.5

7.6 Forgery

7.6.1COURT-RECORDS

7.6.2FINANCIAL-INST/REAL-ESTATE-RECORDS

7.6.3FINANCIAL-INST-RECORDS

7.6.4POLICE-RECORDS

7.7 Predicated Acts-Other

7.7.1HARASS-INTIM-RETAL-WIT-INF-VIC

7.7.2TAMPERING WITH WITNESS

7.8 Racketeering

RACKETEERING-PREDICATED-ACTS

7.9 Misprision of Felonies

7.9.1MISPRISION OF FELONIES-GENERAL

7.9.2MISPRISION OF FELONIES-IN-COURT

8 Events

8.1 LA-County

SBX2-11 (09-02-20)

8.2 Other

TARP-BAILOUT

9 Events-All-Crim

9.1 LA-County-All-Crim

9.1.1 DARWISH-GALDJIE (98-06) All Crim

9.1.1..1 DARWISH-GALDJIE/CONNOR-JUDGMENT (02-05-09)

9.1.1..2 FINE-9TH-PETITION/DENIAL (09-06-30)

9.1.2 FINE-HABEAS (09-03-19_09-06-20) All Crim

9.1.2..1 FINE-HABEAS/JUDGMENT (09-06-29) All Crim

9.1.2..2 FINE-HABEAS/WOEHRLE-R-R (09-06-12)

9.1.3 FINE-MARINA (??-??)All Crim

9.1.3.1 FINE-MARINA/IMPRISONMENT (09-03-04) All Crim

9.1.4 LA-COUNTY-PAYMENTS-TO-JUDGES (90s-present) All Crim

9.1.5 MCARTHUR-PARK=MELEE (07-05-01)

9.1.6 RAMPART-SCANDAL (98-00)

9.1.7 STURGEON-LA-COUNTY (07-pesent ) All Crim

9.1.7.1 STURGEON-LACOUNTY/4th-RULING (08-10-10) All Crim

9.1.8 ZERNIK-CONNOR (08-03-05_09-04-30) All Crim

9.1.9 ZERNIK-MELSON (09-05-01_09-??) All Crim

9.1.10 ZERNIK-SAMAAN (05-10-25-present) All Crim

9.1.10.1 ZERNIK-SAMAAN/JUDGMENT (07-08-09) All Crim

9.1.10.2 ZERNIK-SAMAAN/PASTERNAK-EX-PARTE (08-12-07) All Crim

9.1.10.3 ZERNIK-SAMAAN/SEGAL-PASTERNAK-APPT (07-11-09) All Crim

9.2 Other-All-Crim

10 Financial-Inst

10.1 Financial-Inst-Other

10..2Domestic-All-Crim

10.2.1 BANK OF AMERICA CORP/ COUNTRYWIDE - All Crim

10.2.1.1 – SAMUELS, SANDOR – Associate General Counsel All Crim

10.2.1.2 – BOOCK, TODD – In-house Counsel -All Crim

10.2.1.3 – SHATZ, SANFORD – In-house Counsel All Crim

10.2.1.4 – MCLAURIN, MARIA – Branch Manager All Crim

10.2.2 COLDWELL-BANKER-RESIDENTIAL All Crim

10.2.2.1 – LIBOW, MICHAEL All Crim -

10.2.2.2 –STEIN, BETH – All Crim

10.2.3 COUNTRYWIDE – All Crim

10.2.3.1 -MOZILO, ANGELO- All Crim

10.2.4 OLD REPUBLIC TITLE/ MARA ESCROW – All Crim

10.2.4.1 - HERSHOWITZ, GAIL – All Crim

10.2.4.2 – COHEN, LIZ – All Crim

10.2.5 UNION BANK

10.2.6 UNITED TITLE COMPANY

10.2.7 USC CREDIT UNION All Crim

10.2.7.1 –PEREZ, GARY – President – All Crim

10.2.7.2 –LORITZ, DANIEL – Counsel – All Crim

10.2.7.3 –SCHWARZ, CHRISTINE – Loan Dept All Crim

10.3 International-All-Crim

10.3.1 BANK OF AMERICA CORP

10.3.1.1. - LEWIS, KENNETH-CEO All Crim

10.3.1.2 O’KEEFE, ED- General Counsel All Crim

10.3.2

10.3.3 OLD REPUBLIC TITLE

11 Gov-Domestic

adfa

Gov-DOMESTIC

11.1 City-Bev-Hills

11.1.1 City-Hall

11.1.2 BHPD –All-Crim

11.1.2.1 - SNOWDON, DAVID – Chief – All Crim

11.1.2.2 -SEEGER, STEVE – Chief – All Crim

11.2 City-La-Verne

City-Hall

LVPD

11.3 City-LA

City-Hall

LAPD

11.4 LA County – All Crim

11.4..1 AUDITOR-CONTROLLER

11.4..2 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

11.4..3 COUNSEL

11.4..4 MEN’S JAIL

11.4..5 REGISTRAR-RECORDER

11.4..6 SHERIFF DEPARTMENT

11.4..7 SUPERIOR COURT

11.5 CA

11.5.1 SENATE

11.5.2 BAR ASSOCIATION

11.5.3 ATTORNEY GENERAL

11.6 US

11.6.1 DEPT-JUSTICE

11.6.1.1 – OFFICE- ATTY-GEN

11.6.1.1.1- HOLDER, ERIC – Attorney General

11.6.1.1.2- MELSON, KENNETH- Director

11.6.1.1.3- MUKASEY, MICHAEL – Former Attorney General

11.6.1.2 - FBI

11.6.1.2.2- KAISER, KENNETH

11.6.1.3 DEPT-JUSTICE/IG

11.6.2 CONGRESS

11.6.2.1 - CONYERS, ? – Congressman

11.6.2.2 - FEINSTEIN, DIANNE-Senator

11.6.2.3 - LEAHY, PATRICK-Senator

11.6.2.4 - TARP

11.6.2.5 - TARP/IG

11.6.2.6 - WATERS, MAXINE – Congresswoman

11.6.2.7 - WATSON, DIANE – Congresswoman

11.6.3 DHS

11.6.3.1 - US-SS

11.6.4 OFFICE-CONT-CURR

11.6.4.1

11.6.5 OFFICE-THRIFT-SUPERV

11.6.5.1

11.6.6 OFF-TRADE-COMM

11.6.6.1

11.6.7 OFFICE OF PRES

11.6.7.1 - BUSH, GEORGE H- Former President

11.6.7.2 - BUSH, GEORGE W-Former President

11.6.7.3 -OBAMA, BARACK- President

11.6.8 SEC

11.6.8.1 SEC ENFORCEMENT

11.6.8.1.1 –THOMAS, LINDA-Former Enforcement Head

11.6.9 CIA

12 Gov-Country

12.6 China

12.7 Israel

12.8 Norway

12.9 Spain

12.10 Switzerland

13 Gov-Internat.

13.1 Human-Rights-Courts

13.2 Banking-Accords-Committee

14 Judges& Court Officers


14.1 CA Courts

14.1.1 CRT SUPREME CRT

14.1.1.1 - GEORGE, RONALD- Chief Justice

14.6.1 CRT APP 1ST

14.6.1.1 - RICHMAN, JAMES – Justice, APP 1st

14.2 CA Courts

14.2.1 CRT-LA-SUPERIOR – All Crim

14.2.1.1 - CLARKE, JOHN – Clerk- All Crim

14.2.1.2 - COLLINS, PATRICIA – Judge – RET All Crim

14.2.1.3 - CONNOR, JACQUELINE – Judge All Crim

14.2.1.4 - FRIEDMAN, TERRY - Judge All Crim

14.2.1.5 – HART-COLE LISA – Judge All Crim

14.2.1.6 - MCCOY, CHARLES – Presiding Judge All Crim

14.2.1.7 - ROSENBERG, GERALD – Judge All Crim

14.2.1.8 - SEGAL, JOHN – Judge All Crim

14.2.1.9 - YAFFE, DAVID – Judge All Crim

14.2.1.10 - CZULEGER, STEPHEN – Presiding Judge All Crim

14.2.1.11 – JAIME, VIVIAN –Deputy Clerk All Crim

14.2.2 CRT-APP, 2nd

14.2.2..1 - JUSTICE, APP 2nd All Crim

14.2.2..2 - JUSTICE APP 2nd All Crim

14.3 US Courts

14.3.1 CRT-BKT-TX- CENT

14.3.1.1. - BOHM, JEFF – Judge

14.3.2 CRT-DIST-CA-CENT

14.3.2.1 - PHILLIPS, VIRGINIA – Judge – All Crim

14.3.2.2 - WOEHRLE, CARLA – Magistrate – All Crim

14.3.2.3 - WALTER, JOHN – Judge – All Crim

14.3.2.4 – SAWYER, CHRIS – Pro Se Clerk – All Crim

14.3.2.5 – THOMAS, DONNA – Courtroom Assistant- All Crim

14.3.3 CRT-APP-9th

14.3.3.1 - KOZINSKI, ALEX – CHIEF JUDGE 9th

14.3.3.2 - PAEZ, RICHARD – CIRCUIT JUDGE 9th

14.3.3.3 - TALLMAN, RICHARD – CIRCUIT JUDGE 9th

14.3.4 CRT-APP-7th

14.3.4.1 - POSNER, RICHARD – CHIEF JUDGE 7th

14.3.5 CRT-SUPREME

14.3.5.1 - KENNEDY, ANTHONY - JUSTICE

14.3.5.2 - SOUTER, DAVID – JUSTICE

14.3.6 CRT-DIST-DC

14.3.6.1 - LEON, RICHARD – JUDGE

14.3.6.2 - SCOTT, DAVID – CLERK

14.3.7 CRT-BCK-PA-ESTN

14.3.7.1 -AGRESTI, THOMAS

14.3.8 CRT-NY-STHRN

14.3.8.1 -RAKOFF, JED

15. Law

15.1 CA

15.2 INT

UNIV-DECL-HUM-RIGHTS

15.3 US

15.3.1 ABUSE CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW

15.3.2 COMPEL-US-OFFICER-PERFORM-DUTIES

15.3.3 FIFTH

15.3.4 FIRST AMENDMENT

15.3.5 FOURTEENTH

15.3.6 FOURTH AMENDMENT

15.3.7 NIXON V WARNER COMM (1978)

15.3.8 RICO

15.3.9 SECOND AMEND

15.3.10 SIXTH

15.3.11 THIRD AMEND

15.3.12 US CONSTITUTION

15,3,12.1 - ARTICLE IV §1 - AUTHENTICATION

16

15.3.13 U.S. ACT OF MAY 26, 1790

17

18 Media

15.2 Media-Var

16.1.1 CBS

16.1.2 LA TIMES

16.1.3 KNBC

16.1.4 THE NEW REPUBLIC

16.1.5 NEW YORK TIMES

17. Parties

17.1 Individuals

17.1.1 DARWISH, BARBARA

17.1.2 RAMPART-FIPS

17.1.3 STURGEON, HAROLD

17.2 Individuals All Crim

17.2.1 LLOYD, JAY ARRE Convicted Felon

17.2.2 PEREZ, RAFAEL Convicted Felon

17.2.3 SAMAAN, NIVIE All-Crim

17.2.4 Parks Victor All-Crim

17.3 Corporations

17.3.1

17.4 Corporations – All Crim

17.4.1 DEL RAY SHORE JOINT VENTURE – All Crim

17.4.2 DEL RAY SHORE JOINT VENTURE NORTH – All Crim

17.5 Organizations-Not For Profit

17.5.1 ACLU

17.5.2 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH

17.5.3 AMNESTY

17.5.4 CA FIRST AMEND COALITION

17,5,5 CA FIRST AMEND PROJECT

17.5.6 ATTYS WITHOUT BORDERS